AI could mean 100-million-bushel decline in feed use

The United States is on the tail end of the worst avian influenza outbreak in history, with 222 confirmed cases and more than 47 million birds affected across 15 states. USDA expects the outbreak to plateau near 50 million birds this summer.

The United States is on the tail end of the worst avian influenza outbreak in history, with 222 confirmed cases and more than 47 million birds affected across 15 states. USDA expects the outbreak to plateau near 50 million birds this summer.

The 2014-15 outbreak exceeds the 1983 record by more than 30 million birds and has led to disruptions in the supply of eggs, localized interruptions in turkey production, and legitimate concerns over potential exposure to the avian influenza in the broiler population this fall.

University of Illinois economists John Newton and Todd Kuethe provide the following analysis:

With respect to feed use of corn, conservative estimates of “one bushel per bird” imply that avian influenza could result in feed and residual use of corn being 50 million bushels less than projected for the current marketing year. From current projections, a feed consumption level greater than one bushel per bird, combined with a slow rate of flock repopulation, could support a 100-million-bushel decline in feed use. Absent increased consumption in other categories, such a decline would push the corn carryout closer to the two-billion-bushel threshold and would continue to pressure old-crop corn prices.

For the current marketing year, USDA’s World Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) projections of feed and residual use of corn have ranged from a low of 5.25 billion bushels to a high of 5.375 billion bushels. Most recently, after the March 30 Grain Stocks report, which indicated higher-than-anticipated quarterly corn stocks, USDA reduced projections for feed and residual use of corn to 5.25 billion bushels. This number has remained unchanged through the June 10 WASDE projections despite the pace of avian influenza confirmations accelerating in April and May of 2015.

No USDA revisions

Put simply, USDA has not revised feed and residual use of corn lower as a result of the avian influenza. There are several reasons why this may be the case.

First, the decline in feed use attributable to the avian influenza is not expected to significantly alter total poultry consumption of corn. USDA ERS Feed Grains Yearbook indicates that, for the 2014-15 marketing year, poultry is estimated to represent 34 percent of grain-consuming animal units. Given the ERS projection for 5.25 billion bushels of corn used for feed, poultry use is expected to total 1.8 billion bushels of corn. These bushels are consumed across all poultry categories. Based on USDA data, a majority of the avian influenza confirmations have occurred in the layer and turkey flocks.

Broiler production is the largest poultry production category and has been largely spared by the avian influenza. While catastrophic to affected operations, the avian influenza has resulted in a fairly isolated production disruption. Thus, with 47 million birds depopulated, the USDA poultry inventory and slaughter data suggest that only a small percentage of the U.S. poultry population is affected by the avian influenza. Further, the USDA has stressed agency efforts to repopulate affected producers in a safe and timely manner.

Second, feed use in other animal categories accounts for 66 percent of total consumption and may offset any declines in poultry use. In the June 10 WASDE, USDA recognized the supply disruption caused by the avian influenza and lowered projections for 2015 production of turkeys and eggs by 6 percent and 4 percent, respectively. However, in the same report, USDA increased projections for milk, pork, and broiler production. Thus, increases in USDA projections for the production of other animal products likely offset any feed declines attributable to the avian influenza.

Finally, and most important, estimating how much corn is fed to livestock is an inexact science. USDA does not survey livestock producers to determine how much feed is actually fed to livestock. Instead, USDA determines an “implied feed and residual use” of corn by calculating the amount of corn consumption unexplained, using known inventory levels, known import volumes, and known consumption values for exports and industrial uses, that is, ethanol. For example, based on the March 1 Grain Stocks report, after accounting for all other consumption, implied feed and residual use of corn for the first half of the 2014-15 marketing year was 3.668 billion bushels, 70 percent of the USDA’s projection for the year of 5.25 billion bushels.

Correlation of crop size and corn use

However, the pace of feed and residual use varies considerably from year to year. As a general rule of thumb, during big crop years, feed and residual use of corn is greater than during years with short crops. USDA data reveals a direct correlation between crop size (measured in yield deviation from trend) and the ratio of corn use per grain-consuming animal unit. Given the record corn crop of 2014, a large feed and residual use value is to be expected.

It is still too early to know how large feed and residual use will be and if the pace of feed use supports USDA’s 5.25 billion bushel projection. In previous years, the percentage of first-half feed and residual use has varied from 64 percent from the 1996-97 to 2005-06 period to as high as 74 percent during the most recent 2010-11 to 2013-14 marketing years. Applying these historical percentages to the implied first-half feed and residual use suggests a wide range for the 2014-15 marketing year, between 4.9 and 5.7 billion bushels.

At this point, the 800-million-bushel range of potential feed and residual use values swamps any feed component lost to the avian influenza. However, third-quarter corn stocks will be reported in the June 30 Grain Stocks report and represent an opportunity to update expectations on 2014-15 feed and residual use. Following this report, USDA is more likely to modify feed and residual use and may credit the avian influenza for any downward revisions.

Page 1 of 3
Next Page