Create a free Feed Strategy account to continue reading

OP-ED: How to actively prevent feed from being a fomite

Dr. John Clifford, USAPEEC veterinary trade adviser and former USDA Chief Veterinary Officer, provides his insights on pathogen control.

feed-pellets-for-poultry
A_noina | Shutterstock.com

In my 12 years as U.S. Chief Veterinary Officer, it was clear that active intervention to prevent food contamination has always been, and remains, key to consumer safety, animal health, free trade and production efficiency. Knowingly introducing a contaminant, whether deliberately or through inaction, on the condition that you will eliminate it later in the production process, has never been acceptable to regulators or to the poultry and swine industries.

It’s that word “knowingly” that prompted me to begin my six-month investigation into the role that feed can play as a fomite for pathogens, such as Salmonella, African swine fever (ASF), and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDv), and to better understand how changes in analytics and policy around feed pathogens are set to impact production and trade programs in the future.

Throughout my career I’ve had privileged access to some of the world’s leading authorities and, in my series of webinars over the past four months produced in coordination with Feed Strategy/WATT Global Media and sponsored by Anitox, I’ve been able to share those insights with producers, investors, regulators, consumers and leaders of our biggest food producers.