Create a free Feed Strategy account to continue reading

Navigating pet nutrition myths in the social media age

Misinformation spreads quickly online — pet food professionals must step up to educate consumers.

2 Lisa Selfie December 2020 Headshot
Pet owners need to research to ensure their decisions are based on science and appropriate for their specific pet before making nutritional decisions.
Pet owners need to research to ensure their decisions are based on science and appropriate for their specific pet before making nutritional decisions.
Created by Tim Wall using DALL-E 4

A pet parent scrolling through TikTok might encounter viral videos claiming kibble is toxic, raw meat is the only proper diet, or that homemade pet food with human superfoods is the healthiest option. While some influencers promote sound nutritional advice, others push misleading or even harmful feeding trends. As pet nutrition myths gain traction online, pet food manufacturers must address misinformation to ensure pets receive balanced, science-backed diets.

Dr. Gary Richter, founder of Ultimate Pet Nutrition, warns that social media content is driven by likes and views rather than scientific facts. “If people want to take the best care of their pets, they need to exercise due diligence when deciding what to feed them,” he said. Reliable pet nutrition information is available from veterinarians, pet nutritionists and reputable sources, but many pet owners fall prey to viral trends without verifying their validity.

Popular myths include the belief that grain-free food is harmful, or conversely, that food without grains is bad for dogs. Some claim raw food is the only healthy option, while others insist it’s dangerous. Kibble is sometimes portrayed as toxic, while other sources claim feeding anything other than kibble is unsafe. These conflicting messages create confusion among pet owners, influencing purchasing behavior and shaping demand for certain pet food products — often without scientific support.