Study: Carbon footprint of feed partially offsets benefits of grazing

Although increased grazing can reduce carbon emissions in some circumstances, new research says the benefits are less certain when supplemental feed enters the mix.

Cow grazing in green meadow with forest backdrop, surrounded by CH4 methane emission bubbles and cloud text
volrab vaclav | BigStock.com

Increased grazing can improve rangeland and sequester more carbon in soils — but the carbon benefits may be overstated if the role of supplemental feed is not taken into account, according to new research led by the University of Cambridge.

The research, published in the journal Science, determined that grazing still sequesters more carbon than it emits on a global scale. But when the researchers accounted for factors such as supplemental feed requirements and increased enteric methane from ruminants, the potential benefit dropped by about 30%, according to Robert Powell, a Ph.D. researcher at the University of Cambridge and the lead author on the study.

Log in to view the full article
Page 1 of 14
Next Page